Laura M. Colarusso, Defense News, 1 mei 2006
The cost of the U.S. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program has risen
to $82.1 million, enough to require the Pentagon to notify Congress,
which it has done, according to Air Force officials.
Surging material costs, especially for aluminum and titanium; the
addition of another wing production line in Italy; and program
restructuring are to blame, according to Air Force sources.
The price tag for a single JSF has risen by 33 percent since 2001, when
the average plane cost $61.8 million, the sources said. Spokesmen for
the JSF program and builder Lockheed Martin did not return phone calls
seeking comment.
The JSF is among dozens of Air Force programs whose costs are outpacing
their budgets enough to require a congressional report under the
Nunn-McCurdy law. Changes to the law in the 2006 National Defense
Authorization Act have made it more common for programs to be in
violation. Before 2006, the services had to notify Congress if they saw
an increase of 15 percent from year to year.
If the cost grew by 25 percent, the services had to report the breach
and justify the program based on national security needs. With the 2006
authorization bill changes, Congress must be notified of programs that
see a 30 percent cost growth over their original baseline budget.
Prime contractor Lockheed Martin's "teaming restructure" with the
company's subcontractors will cost about $1 billion, sources said.
The Air Force is facing $6.1 billion in shortfalls for growing
requirements and aircraft upgrades as officials begin preliminary work
on the 2008 budget submission. One large portion of that is spare
parts, which the Air Force "didn't take into account" when it budgeted
for the program, an Air Force source said. In January, JSF program
officials disclosed the total overrun is estimated to be about $19
billion, the sources said. The Air Force portion of that is about $9.3
billion, they said.
another Air Force source called the service's current funding for the
JSF program "insufficient to meet all requirements."
Air Force plans call for buying 1,763 F-35s, but service officials
acknowledged they might not be able to afford that many. To make up for
the cost overruns, the Air Force is studying how many aircraft it
should give up.
One option includes cutting 55 aircraft from the Air Force's proposed
buy. Another option could be to acquire 82 fewer aircraft. A third
option would have the Air Force buy 89 fewer aircraft.
Sources cautioned, however, no decisions have been made.
This is not the first time the $250 billion program has run into cost
problems. In 2004, program officials acknowledged the aircraft was
about 1,000 pounds overweight. That added about a year to the
developmental testing, which in turn boosted the cost of the program by
about $5 billion.